> I hadn't jumped in here before because I personally don't see > much point in a PIC 18 to PIC 30 translator, other than it's > something you want to do just because you want to do it. The > differences in peripherals are going to make all put purely > "internal" code pretty much impossible. You can make a PIC > 30 stand on its head and waste a bunch of cycles and sortof > act like a PIC > 18 some ot the time with a lot of work. I'd rather spend the > time to recode the application into native PIC 30 and get the > full benefit of the processor. If you aren't pushing the > speed, then why isn't the 18F good enough in the first place? There is a huge volume of available code on piclist.com that is not specific to peripherals and which can most effectively be translated into PIC 30 code with machine assistance. If the translation can be improved by hand, hopefully people will do so and share the result. --- James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com 1-619-652-0593 phone http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786 PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist