On 1/25/06, Dumitru Stama wrote: > > I think 2.4 GHz is very high for underwater broadcasts. please don't say stupid things my friend. What epsilon have water ? It was over the water not "in water" ! regards, Vasile > Under water you could get away with a low frequency transmission, even > a sonar but i am quite sure 2.4GHz will not do the job. > > Dumitru Stama > > > MB> Could you have some sort of antenna below the water level? I'm not su= re what > MB> the specifics would be, but given that sound travels so much better > MB> underwater, it might be an option. > MB> - Marcel > > MB> On 1/24/06, Enrico Schuerrer wrote: > >> > >> > >> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: "VULCAN20" > >> An: "pic microcontroller discussion list" > >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. J=E4nner 2006 22:02 > >> Betreff: [EE] 2.4 GHz over water??? > >> > >> > >> > I am not knowledgeable with radio waves. I was thinking of a project > >> > using the Maxstream xbee Zigbee pro radios. I need to send data fro= m a > >> > small rc boat to a larger full size boat about 1000 M distance. > >> > The big boat will have the ant about 3 to 4 M above water. The small > >> > boat I would like to have as low as possible. I asked an old ham ra= dio > >> > person about it and he said It would not work due to freq. and height > >> > above water. > >> > I e-mail Maxstream and all they would comment that it depended upon = the > >> > height above water and would not suggest min height required. > >> > Any thoughts on this? > >> > >> IMHO a question of the antenna height on the smaller boat above the > >> waterline AND the height of sea waves. From the point of free space > >> attenuation it's only a question of transmitting power and receiver > >> sensitivity and the used antennas. A bigger problem I assume will be i= f the > >> small boat is in a wave trough and so the direct visible line between = the > >> antennas is interrupted. > >> > >> > > >> > Any other radios that could be used? Requirements: about 1000M over > >> > freshwater, wave height less then 1M., > >> > the large boat would send signal to start data collection. Then wh= en > >> > small boat had data it would send it back to larger boat. > >> > > >> > >> If you use a data transmission protocol with data protection even > >> interuptions should not be a problem. > >> > >> Enrico > >> OE1EQW > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist