Dumitru Stama wrote:

>I think 2.4 GHz is very high for underwater broadcasts.
>Under water you could get away with a low frequency transmission, even
>a sonar but i am quite sure 2.4GHz will not do the job.
>
>Dumitru Stama
>
>
>MB> Could you have some sort of antenna below the water level? I'm not sure what
>MB> the specifics would be, but given that sound travels so much better
>MB> underwater, it might be an option.
>MB> - Marcel
>  
>

I was planning on using radios because they are more energy efficient  
then sonar also there are other factors involved that would prohibit 
signals through the water.

John

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist