Shawn Wilton wrote:

> Which uC are you using?  

This device is using one of the 18F6722 family. But this is not really
relevant because the built-in EEPROMs seem to be pretty much the same WRT
endurance.

> The (for example) pic18f452 specifies a read/write cycle of 1E6.  Not
> bad!  

I suppose you're looking at D124, and forgetting about D120? Or you're
looking at the typical value and not counting the minimum value? FWIW, I
was looking at the minimum value for D120, and this is 100k for my chip and
the 18F452.

> So upgrade your chip and maybe you can run your device until dogs really
> do run over the world...

Doesn't look like this would be an upgrade :)

> Doing some hunting around in various data sheets, I do believe I have
> answered my own question regarding EEPROM size (256B?).

In the chip in the device I'm using it's 1k.

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist