Yeah, can we please kill this thread and just all agree SVN is better.. :-P

But before we do...

If cvs is meant to mean the actual program that maintains a versioned
repository then it should really be spelled CVS to indicate formality (much
as you would capitalize Electrical Engineering if you're speaking about a
University dept.).  However, spelled as cvs it should most likely mean a
concurrent versioning system, which could mean any "cvs".  :-)

Ooh, 5am.  Time for bed.



On 1/19/06, Gerhard Fiedler <lists@connectionbrazil.com> wrote:
>
> John De Villiers wrote:
>
> > Because thats the way i chose to do it.
> > Also, svn doesnt use rcs *,v files.
>
> Yeah... here we go again, with the terminology problem. You wrote: "I have
> another machine that is idle most of the time and that has a huge disk. It
> runs a nightly update of all /cvs/ repositories that i have."
>
> This lead me to believe (don't know why? :) that you use cvs, not svn. And
> cvs does use rcs *,v files...
>
> Gerhard
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



--


Shawn Wilton (b9 Systems)
http://black9.com
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist