Don't apologize Bill, All of us understand that the free stuff comes
with no warranty. I saw some new code and decided to test it. I was
working on a similar app so I was inerested. I had the complex code
working anyways :-)

Maybe your code and my testing would benefit someone.

I'll modify the code and will post the results tomorrow.

Regards,

Chetan


On 1/18/06, Bill & Pookie <reddx@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Found the problem from your data.  I have the bits of the byte numbered in
> reverse.  Where I do a "BTFSS ADLOW,00" it should be bit 07 instead of 00.
> Bit 1 should be 06....and bit 7 is 00.  And the same for all the bit tests
> of ADHIGH.
>
> I did do some limited testing on the program and thought it worked.  For the
> fully untested code, I apologize..
>
> The problem became apparent by looking for what hex values resulted in a
> display with 10 or 5 in it.  hex 1F is 19.3, so it has both 10 and 5.   hex
> 3E just has 5,   hex 5D just has 10.
>
> 0001 1111     10     5
> 0011 1110              5
> 0101 1101      10
>
> xxxx xxx1    bits only on when 10
> xxxx xx1x    bits only on when 5
>
> So it looks like I am testing low order bit when should be testing high
> order bit..
>
> Bill

--
Chetan Bhargava
Web: http://www.bhargavaz.net
Blog: http://microz.blogspot.com

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist