Yeah, neither one is "recommended" per se:  <
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.3>

Both have their adv. and disadv.



On 1/18/06, Alex Harford <harford@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/18/06, John De Villiers <bbj@plz.co.za> wrote:
> >
> > I dont know BDb that well ( at all ) so i steered clear of it affecting
> > a recovery.
>
> John, I believe the recommended backend to use is FSFS now because BDB
> was running into bugs when Subversion was hammering on it.
>
> The backend type can be changed easily (svnadmin dump, create a new
> repo as FSFS, svnadmin load)
>
> Alex
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>



--


Shawn Wilton (b9 Systems)
http://black9.com
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist