OK, all those sound reasonable.  Which of these do you think you'd 
personally use?

That is - I'm swamped this month, but I'll get back to it at some point; 
which ones would make the most difference to you?

Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> 
>>>The patch in its current format only have the option to program the
>>>hex file. It would be nice to add some other options. ;-)
>>
>>What would you like?
> 
> For example, I can think of the following.
> 1) writing and verify (already implemented) but need to consider 18F
> support.
> 2) reading from the PIC to a hex file
> 3) verify a PIC with a hex file
> 4) erase a PIC
> 5) blankchecka PIC
> 6) option to specify a PIC family and even the chip name for the base
> line PIC.

-- 
Timothy J. Weber
http://timothyweber.org
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist