On 1/16/06, Shawn Wilton wrote: > He was asking for a way to backup only the changes. I think an incremental > dump pretty much does that. Hence, I disagree with your statement that an > incremental dump is not a backup. Especially if you have a script that added the diffs between revisions to a tar.gz file. Since the text in the diffs is already in the file from previous versions, it should compress quite nicely. Alex -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist