> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu 
> [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Freeman
> 
> gpasm the following code assembles fine for me:
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> 	processor 16C71
> 	ifdef __16C71
> 	include "p16c71.inc"
> 	__config _XT_OSC & _WDT_OFF & _CP_OFF & _PWRTE_ON
> ramtop  set 0x0C
> 	endif
> 
> 	; data storage needed for delays and general purpose
> 
> 	cblock ramtop
> 	endc
> 	end
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> 

You are of course correct and the above code is okay for
both gpasm and MPASM. And maybe it is good to have this
for multiple MCU.

Still I would like to point out that more "standard" way 
to define the processor for MPASM is like the following 
(from the MPLAB template). gpasm is happy with it as well.

  list      p=16c71       ; list directive to define processor
  #include <p16c71.inc>   ; processor specific variable definitions

Regards,
Xiaofan

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist