>From the include file for the 16c71

;==========================================================================
;
;       RAM Definition
;
;==========================================================================

        __MAXRAM H'AF'
        __BADRAM H'07', H'30'-H'7F', H'87'

And from the 16F84 for instance
;==========================================================================
;
;       RAM Definition
;
;==========================================================================

        __MAXRAM H'CF'
        __BADRAM H'07', H'50'-H'7F', H'87'

Maybe these could be used to set the top ram address and then compute down
from there ? 
Its an idea I just remember that the include files had some stuff on ram in
them

Steve..

-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Chetan Bhargava
Sent: 10 January 2006 21:15
To: pic microcontroller discussion list
Subject: [PIC] gpasm syntax problem

Hi,

I'm working on a small code that I want to be portable on couple of
processors.
I'm using the following code to set ramtop depending on processor.

Assembling this code on gpasm spits errors while mpasm happily assembles it.

.
.
.
00023         #ifdef PIC16C71
00024           include "P16C71.inc"
00025           processor 16C71
00026           __config _XT_OSC & _WDT_OFF & _CP_OFF & _PWRTE_ON
Error [103] : syntax error
00027          ramtop  set 0x0C
00028         #endif
00029
00030         ;data storage needed for delays and general purpose
00031
Error [113] : Symbol not previously defined (ramtop).
00032         cblock ramtop
.
.
.

What could I be possibly doing wrong that offends gpasm?

Regards,

--
Chetan Bhargava
Web: http://www.bhargavaz.net
Blog: http://microz.blogspot.com

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist