> Maarten Hofman wrote:
> > 1) Relocatable code, in its basic form, is apt to add additional code
> > for bank switching
>
> Completely untrue.  Bank switching is required when you go back and forth
> between locations in different banks.  This has nothing to do with absolute
> versus relocatable mode.
>
> You generally do assume that anything outside the current module can be in
> another code page.  However, that is only because you have the option of
> letting the linker place the modules.  If you really want to, you can force
> specific modules to specific pages, then not include PCLATH diddling when
> you go between modules known to be on the same page.

With "in its basic form" I meant: while letting the linker decide how
to place modules. I agree that if you plan these things better, the
result can almost always be the same as absolute code (which I also
mentioned in my original Email). I actually like this "basic form"
which allows me to worry less about these sort of details.

Greetings,
Maarten Hofman.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist