On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 20:21 -0500, David VanHorn wrote:
> > I personally have zero interest of seeing non PIC stuff. If I was
> > interested in AVR stuff I'd join an AVR list, or at least post under the
> > AVR tag.
> 
> 
> I like seeing what's going on in other processors.
> I wasn't always an AVR guy either you know.. :)
> At one time, I wrote PIC code. (and Z8, and Z-80, and 8051...)

It's not a matter of not wanting to see what's going on with other
processors.

Look at it this way: if I want Italian food, would walking into a
Chinese restaurant make much sense?

I have nothing against the AVR personally, it's just that I'm very
familiar with PICs, and haven't had a reason to go with anything else.

I have done "educational" designs with other MCUs (Zilog, AVRs,
Freescale, etc.), but those were just for keeping abreast of what's out
there. On the PICLIST I come for the PIC info.

If you feel strongly about it, there's nothing stopping you from
creating a "general MCU" list.

TTYL

-----------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist