>> True, but russell has a point the downside is potentially HUGE.

> So is the effect of an asteroid striking the earth and most people
> think it is only the subject for movies. Of course, most people 
> don't
> look at the long term probabilites.

Asteroid strike probabilities are as well known as we can reasonably 
get them, are not of our making, not huge in probability x magnitude 
product, not of our making, we are working towards knowing more, are 
not of our making, are liable to be able to do something about the 
'problem' usefully withing the next century,  are not of our making, 
nothing we are doing is making the problem worse or attempting to 
dangerously exploit an almost wholly unknown ultra dangerous set of 
arcane machinery and  are not of our making.

Also, they are not of our making.

GM fails all these tests.

And the corn/wheat/petunias we are creating could have the magnitude 
for the human specias of the postulated 'Dinosaur Killer'.

> Sometimes we take chances.

Indeed.
But few of us have the opportunity, let alone the effrontery, as our 
good friends at eg M'... do, to make decisions for profit or fickle 
fortune, or just because it's Monday morning, which carry the risk of 
destroying the whole human race. Or worse :-).

Doom, doom ... :-)



            Russell McMahon



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist