On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, William Chops Westfield wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Tad Anhalt wrote:
>
>>   _My understanding_ of the situation is that the act of linking itself
>> is what LGPL allows.  Static/dynamic isn't the issue except that there
>> must be a way provided to re-link with (a) different version(s) of the
>> LGPL library(s).
>> 
> Which of course wrecks havoc with any embedded sort of application.
> "Here's the .o module of our proprietary code that can be linked
> with this list of LGPL libraries.  And there's your box with its
> OTP soldered in chip containing the old code.  Have fun!"

I do not see a problem with that. The LGPL does not imply non-OTP 
devices. Specify flash to the client and provide the .o file and a copy 
of the LGPL on the documentation cdrom and just forget about it imho.

Peter
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist