On Dec 22, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Tad Anhalt wrote:

>   _My understanding_ of the situation is that the act of linking itself
> is what LGPL allows.  Static/dynamic isn't the issue except that there
> must be a way provided to re-link with (a) different version(s) of the
> LGPL library(s).
>
Which of course wrecks havoc with any embedded sort of application.
"Here's the .o module of our proprietary code that can be linked
with this list of LGPL libraries.  And there's your box with its
OTP soldered in chip containing the old code.  Have fun!"

BillW

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist