William ChopsWestfield wrote:

> Huh?  I'm talking about source licenses.  

That wasn't completely clear to me.

> Distributing a binary containing (any amount of) statically-linked GPL
> code obligates me to also release SOURCE of my proprietary code.  

In the same way as pretty much any statically linked commercial source code
impedes you to release the code of the application. Where's the difference?
Why is one called "viral" and the other not?

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist