R Morris (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:

> By design, we trying to do better than gmane and in a lot of areas, I
> think we've succeeded. Hopefully, when we get the posting changes done
> to use a subscription model, you'll agree. 

Probably not... :)  I'm a fan of local reading, and I'm a fan of all the
tools a decent newsreader provides for reading lists like this one. No web
interface can give me that better than my newsreader. For searching and
reading way-back posts in archives, gmane does what I need; nabble may be
different, but I don't see anything better. 

But when you get the posting interface to work transparently, I'll agree
that there's nothing wrong with it :)

Just out of curiosity: in what areas do you think you do better than gmane
(in mirroring mailing lists)?

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist