Bob Axtell wrote:
> You will get bogged down quickly trying  to do this by the specs.

Why do you say that?  This is exactly what I'll be trying to do.  I have
read the standard and the 18F2550 data sheet and it all seems clear enough
at this point.  It sounds like you know something more here.  What have you
found?

> My printed copy of the USB 2.0specs is 2  2" notebooks thick.

Mines not so bad as I used a single 4" notebook ;-).  Really though, while
the spec is certainly dry it does appear to be complete and clear.  All in
all I thought it was well written for what it is.  I've certainly seen
worse.

> Microchip makes fooling with the USB PICs a tough job.

Please elaborate as I'm about to start doing this.

On a bigger point, why does everyone have the attitude that this must be
done by someone else.  Clearly *someone* has to understand and implement
this stuff.  To me this prevailing attitude is even more motivation to do it
myself because I'll end up with something more rare and therefore valuable
in the end.  What am I missing?


******************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, (978) 742-9014.  #1 PIC
consultant in 2004 program year.  http://www.embedinc.com/products
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist