thank you all for the response. The blueradio-based modules indeed looks great, and easy to interface. Another interesting component might be the LMX9820 http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/55450.pdf Stef Marc Nicholas wrote: >http://www.sparkfun.com > >Look at their Blueradio-based modules. Very, very easy to use and well >priced. > >-marc > >On 12/2/05, Stef Mientki wrote: > > >>hello, >> >>I thinking of realizing a wireless link, from a portable PIC system to a >>PC. >>The needed datarate is about 100 kbit. >>No (or maybe very slow) data from PC to PIC. >> >>Another requirement is to use as much standard components as possible. >> >>So there seems 2 ways to go: wifi or bluetooth. >> >>Now my guess is that bluetooth devices are easier to interface with a pic, >>and more general available (in small quantities) then wifi. >> >>Anyone has experience with these interfaces ? >>Any other comment ? >> >>thanks, >>Stef Mientki >>-- >>http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >>View/change your membership options at >>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> >> >> -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist