In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, goffi wrote:

for the sceptical persons...  this is a little part of the log of the communication between sxkey and sx.

1110:110011101000<-CE8
1110:110010111011<-CBB
0001:110000100001<-C21
0101:011100110011<-733
0011:011011100100<-6E4
0010:110111110010<-DF2
0110:010111110010<-5F2
0101:010011111110<-4FE
0011:001110100101<-3A5
1000:110100000110<-D06
0110:000111111000<-1F8
1111:000010101111<-AF
0010:011011110101<-6F5
1001:010010010000<-490
1100:111111101101<-FED
1101:101010000100<-A84
0000:100101001001<-949
1000:010101001000<-548
1001:111100010010<-F12
1000:000011100010<-E2
0111:110000010101<-C15
0011:010001101111<-46F
1111:000000010100<-14
1001:100101110101<-975
0000:000110101101<-1AD
1101:011100011001<-719
1111:101010001000<-A88
1011:111101001011<-F4B
1010:100011001001<-8C9
1100:110101101101<-D6D
1100:001001010111<-257
1101:101110110110<-BB6

i don't understand why parallax use a secret way to program sx and others persons must to use a 'free' way. i can understand they pay and spent money to develop sxkey but why they use other way? is it better? is it too fast?

---------- End of Message ----------


You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=98928#m99357

Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com

The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)