On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:39 AM, PY2NI_TERRA wrote:

> using CC5X your fragment of code works as it should, no workaround
> required, probably your compiler is pulling your leg somehow.
>

x86 gcc behaves as described in the original post ("False" case.)
See Gerhard's excellent explanation; presumably cc5x uses 8bits for
"int", which is probably technically a standard violation but (IMO)
permissible or even useful for an embedded 8bit processor...

BillW
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist