> R. I. Nelson wrote:
> > most of the stuff I did was + or - 0.0005".  but we
> > still tried and usually achieved 0 tolerance.
> 
> Clearly not.  Saying stuff like this that obviously can't be true just
> eliminates your credibility.  Even if your tools told you the error
was 0,
> that means it was only as close as the tool's accuracy and your
ability to
> read it.

Well now.. He did only express a single digit of precision on the
tolerance.
Perhaps the final measurement was done with a yardstick.  

:)



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist