This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090806070007080601020807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have worked in a machine shop that was climate controlled Temp and humidity. if the climate went out of the control zone we would have to stop operations on some materials. I know on the less critical stuff that I worked on we had Tolerances on every drawing most of the stuff I did was + or - 0.0005". but we still tried and usually achieved 0 tolerance. our measuring tools were checked daily and we had gauge blocks to double check them. That is why I say 18 pulses per second is ABOUT 55.55555ms. and not EXACT. Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > > >Mathematics (and logic) is the only thing that's exact, and it's neither >science nor engineering. I'd go so far as to say that there's /nothing/ >exact in engineering (and that goes for every country I know :). Every >measurement has a tolerance range around it, and not even that range is >exact, as it's usually just a short hand notation for a not quite well >known probability distribution around the given value. > >In science and engineering classes, IMO, should be taught that e.g. 6 V >doesn't really say much, it needs to be e.g. (6 +-0.2) V to make sense. >Because for example (6 +-0.00001) V is something quite different -- and >even that's pretty close to "right on" or "exact" or "no variance", it's >obviously none of these. I've never seen a measurement that was 6 V >/exact/, in the sense of (6 +-0) V. And, you may find that ironic (but it's >actually quite obvious), the more you get into high precision work, the >more important become the tolerances. They are left out (and as such are >implied to be low precision) only in low precision situations; everywhere >precision is relevant they always use values with tolerances. > >I don't know whether you have done engineering work for other people. One >of the most common phrases one hears is "that's close enough" (or maybe >"that's too expensive, make it simpler" :). We (almost) never do the best >we could do given unlimited funds and time, we pretty much always do it >"good enough" and "as simple/cheap/quick as possible". Nothing "exact" or >"precise", all a matter of trade-offs, a lot of "half way things". Having a >good feeling for the "right" trade-off is basically what engineering is >about... :) > >Now I don't know much about the military. Maybe they operate in a different >universe :) > >Gerhard > > > --------------090806070007080601020807 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="rindesigns.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rindesigns.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Robert I. Nelson n:Nelson;Robert I. org:RIN Designs adr:;;P.O. BOX 373;RIPON;WI;54971;USA email;internet:rindesigns@charter.net tel;work:1-(920)-229-7152 tel;home:1-(920)-748-7443 note;quoted-printable:Custom design and building of small electro mechanical devices.=0D=0A= AUTOCAD work ver2002 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard --------------090806070007080601020807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --------------090806070007080601020807--