In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, coco34 wrote: hello my english is very bad i prefer give my opinion with two messages one in french community and a message in english. hello doesn't I do not include/understand why ubicom have to increase the Sx series? why remain with 4K of flash? it is possible to make a new chip with 60 K of flash with the same instructions, it would simply be enough to re-examine the pagination of the RAM... freescale has a series 68hc06 very diverse... a manufacturer who is not able to call itself in question is a bad manufacturer, why the µC IPxxxx no succés? because the development tools are too expensive!!!! have look at yourself the ARM of Philips? lpcxxx 10$ and complete development tools for nothing then stop to tell us "conneries" simply UBICOM has programmed the end of the SX... PS : it is useless to make SXkey with the compiler codes C because the flash is too small the french text message : bonjour je ne comprends pas pourquoi ubicom n'a pas augmenter la série Sx ? pourquoi restez à 4K de flash ? il est possible de faire un nouveau chip avec 60 k de flash avec les mêmes instructions, il suffirait simplement de revoir la pagination de la ram... freescale a une série 68hc06 très diverses... un fabricant qui n'est pas capable de se remettre en question est un mauvais fabricant pourquoi les µC IPxxxx n'ont aucun succés ? parce que les outils de developpement sont trop cher !!!! avez vous regardez les arm de philips ? lpcxx 10 $ le chip et les outils complets de developpement pour rien... alors arretez de nous raconter des conneries simplement UBICOM a déja programmé la fin des SX... PS il est inutile de faire un SXkey avec le compilateur code C car la flash est trop petite ---------- End of Message ---------- You can view the post on-line at: http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=3&m=94091#m98156 Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)