Peter van Hoof wrote:
> One argument in favor of top posting I didn't read about here yet. In
> medium to high volume lists top posting makes it a lot faster to
> determine if someone adds something significant to the argument and the
> posting is worth reading.
>
> It avoids having to scroll down only to find someone gave a one line
> funny remark. It cuts down on time needed to sort chaf from corn and
> this definetely matters when subscribing to a lot of lists.

But the fault here isn't interleaved posting, it's failure to trim material
relevant to the reply.  It's hard to imagine a one line funny reply with the
sentence or two it refers to wouldn't fit nicely on most people email view
panes.


******************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, (978) 742-9014.  #1 PIC
consultant in 2004 program year.  http://www.embedinc.com/products
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist