Surely they must be better than the ones with PMS

<duck>

Cheerful regards,

Bob


>>I do not know about PM200. I used to use a digital/analog
>>Fluke/Philips scope and it is pretty bad as well
>
> I don't know about other folk, but I find that I just cannot get on with
> any
> of the Philips/Fluke instruments that have PM as the leading characters in
> the model number. These are all instruments that came from the Philips
> part
> of the fold, and the continental mind set in how they expect the
> instrument
> to work is quite different to mine.


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist