On 11/23/05, Alan B. Pearce <A.B.Pearce@rl.ac.uk> wrote:
> >Sorry I do not know. It is just my personal
> >perception that the TDS3032 is quite bad.
>
> Hmm, I have an original (not B series) TDS3034, and I quite like it. But I
> do not personally like the current series of Agilent scopes, I find them not
> ideal ergonomically.

 What I can say, I have a Lecroy LT262 350MHz/1GS/s but when I need to
measure noises, I go back to Philips PM200 or to an antique russian
scope.
What is digitally is good for math signal computation and triggering
fancy signals, but when you need to see really small signals without
expensive tricks, an analogic scope is the best.

Vasile

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist