>From what I've read, 2003 offers much better support for wireless networking, which is what I'm primarily interested in doing with my unit (not for the web, for wireless control). Seems that in 2002 not much consideration was given to the fact that people might take their pocket sized device out of range of one network and into another. Josh -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams On 11/22/05, Steph Smith wrote: > I use an IPAQ running pocket pc 2003premium,it freezes quite often and needs > to be reset to continue using it; if your box works reliably 'let sleeping > dogs lie'. -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist