Wouter van Ooijen wrote:
> > For my Wisp628 programmers I use 16F628, 16F628A or 16F648A, whichever I
> have at hand, using the same .hex file. Of course I prefer the 16F628A,
> which is the cheapest of the three

You lost me there, Wouter.  You mean the Wisp628, when programming a 
chip, doesn't check the device ID against the device the hex file was 
assembled for?   I guess I always just kind of assumed it did.  (Which 
kind of invites the reply: "That's what you get for assuming!" I guess.  :-)
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist