Shay wrote:
> Are the code changes, going from a 16f84 to a 16F648A, the same as what
> Maarten said they would be going to a 16F628?

Pretty much.  There is probably a small difference in the config word
between the 16F628 and the 16F648A, but then again these will both be
different from the 16F84 anyway.  The only reason the 16F628A exists is to
be a low cost version of the 16F648 when the extra code space isn't needed.
This can matter a lot for high volume designs, but for hobby use it's better
to have the more capable chips around for the few extra cents each.


******************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, (978) 742-9014.  #1 PIC
consultant in 2004 program year.  http://www.embedinc.com/products
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist