> I have no personal experience with the 16F648A, but since the
> datasheet is identical for 16F627A, 16F628A and 16F648A, I would say
> yes. The only difference seems to be the memory size (1 KWord, for the
> 16F627A, 2 KWord for the 16F628A and 4 KWord for the 16F648A).

Oops... The 16F648A also has more data memory (256 instead of 224) and
more EEPROM memory (256 bytes instead of 128 bytes). However, these
are still not significant changes from the 16F628A, so my list of
changes should still work fine.

Greetings,
Maarten Hofman.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist