Olin Lathrop wrote:

> Shay wrote:
>
>> ok, if it's that easy I might be talked into doing it.  Would I do
>> 16f628 or 16f628A?  Not sure what the difference is between those
>> with/without the A.. just an update of some sort?
>
>
> Do the 16F648A.  It's the same thing with twice the program memory.  This
> extra memory can be completely ignored if you don't use it, but then 
> you'll
> have chips around with more depth for future projects.
>
>
Are the code changes, going from a 16f84 to a 16F648A, the same as what 
Maarten said they would be going to a 16F628?

-Shay
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist