In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, dkemppai wrote:

[b]Ken Gracey (Parallax) said...[/b]

SX52ers:

Since mismanagement of the SX52 has been the theme of the week and you appreciate close communication from Parallax even though we make tactical errors, I should let you know that this issue may not be closed yet. Two more solutions have surfaced this week and we've got them under some tight review. Even though many of you have already made alternative plans and informed your customers of EOL, we're going to continue to follow through on our latest options. 

It's risky to share information unless I'm sure of the outcome, but we're hoping that by Monday we'll have a reliable direction to pursue. 

Your roller coaster operator,

Ken Gracey
Parallax, Inc.  

 



 

 

Ken,

Please keep us posted. I have already started redesigns, so if there is an Sx52 coming back, knowing that early would really help! Again, I'm a little spooked about the SX series, but there is no doubt in my mind that you are trying your best to keep the product alive long term!. 

 

 

Paul,

I have not yet read your PM, but will in a minute. There are no hard feelings here, as it was a frustrating day on both our sides of the keyboard. I was a bit frustrated with finding out about the parallax announcement, long after the rest of the stock was gone! (I'm used to about a year EOL warning, or an offer for lifetime buys, etc.)  FYI, the reason I use the SX52 is that I do very small quantity production, for both my day job and for my contract customers. I chose the SX52 because of package size. I hand solder everything that we build (for both quality and quantity reasons)   [/quote]

-Dan

---------- End of Message ----------


You can view the post on-line at:
http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=2&m=94091#m94639

Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com

The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2005 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)