--- "James Newton, Host" <jamesnewton@piclist.com>
wrote:

> That's enough. This thread is dead.
>=20
> No further posts from anyone regarding the attempt
> to interpret what is
> going on in someone else's head. That is unknowable
> and, as we can see here,
> causes arguments.

While I know that you and Olin are always arguing back
and forth and Olin never seems to do anything right. I
think you are wrong here. Olin obviously has
experience in reviewing r=E9sum=E9 's and discusses in a
mannered way what he would think of this r=E9sum=E9. Olin
is right in giving his requested opinion.

>=20
> For example, nothing like with "The manager is
> thinking X so you should say
> y" or "managers are clueless x heads" or "your
> resume is stupid" since all
> of these fail to account for the fact that we can
> not understand the other
> persons point of view or mind set.
>=20
> Factual issues or issues of language I could
> understand "when you say,
> 'dream job' I think of things that are impossible or
> difficult to fulfill
> since this is part of the definition of that word.
> May I suggest the more
> traditional wording of 'target position' or 'desired
> position'."

The original poster was asking exactly for this. How
else can one make suggestions to improve on the
quality and content of a resume without reviewing and
evaluating it AS SEEN THRU THE EYE OF THE HR GUY
READING IT?

>=20
> Any post with the words stupid, ---hole, (or f**k,
> idiot, dumb, lame, or
> other derogatory term) is likely to get the poster
> moderated or removed from
> the list (again)...=20
>=20
> We're discussing that between the admins now.=20
>=20

That is probably the only thing I can partially agree
with, however I don=92t think Olin was insulting the
poster.

[Rest of post snipped]

Olin's point of view was worth reading to me
personally.

TTYL

Peter van Hoof
--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist