On Oct 27, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Peter wrote:

> management decides to go with a slightly different code.
> The programmer gets to port it.

Portability is an important part of the advantages of a high level
language, although a bit overrated for typical microcontrollers.  OTOH,
perhaps it works really well between the different PIC cores (which,
after all, have SIMILAR architectures and peripheral sets.)  Does anyone
have good things to say about going between 12, 14, and 16 bit PIC cores
using a high level language vs assembler?  (Of course, something like
Olin's environment makes this easier to do in assembler as well.)

BillW

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist