Gerhard Fiedler,

CCS are celebrating their 10th anniversary just now.
And at that time there was, to my knowledge, only one
C compiler for the PICs. And it was not without its problems either.

So what I mean is that judging a product by its qualities (or rather
lack thereof) 10 years ago is at least a little unfair, by my rules.

Do I have to mention Win95, Borland C++ etc? Of course not.
Software is a monkey business. The one without sin, throw the first stone. :-)

But let's leave this: Don't worry... be happy...
My problem seems to be that the net result for me in using CCS is 
on the positive side of the line. (It has not been _without_ surprises though.)

Cheers,
PerL


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerhard Fiedler" <lists@connectionbrazil.com>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]A trustworthy company


> Per Linne wrote:
>> 10 years ago!? No offence, but you can't be serious...
> 
> What do you mean? No offense, but I can be and am serious (every once in a
> while, at least).
> 
> Gerhard
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist