Xiaofan Chen wrote: > That is strange. Which ISO standard? Or is it just an EN standard? ISO 31-0. A short summary (from http://www.ntnu.no/ntnu/old/glos/glos_nr.1_1995/stewart.html): - Starting from, and on either side of, the decimal mark, digits should be placed into groups of three. - The groups should be separated by a small space, never a comma or point. [Helps avoid ambiguities; both 2.850 and 2,850 could be two thousand something or two and something, but 2 850 is unlikely to be taken as not being two thousand something.] - The decimal sign is a comma on the line. - In English language documents a point on the line is often used instead of a comma, and this usage is acknowledged in the ISO 31 standard. [Refers to plain language documents, not technical drawings.] - The comma must never be used as the thousands mark. [See above about ambiguities.] - A million is written as '1 000 000' and a millionth as '0,000 001' or '0.000 001' and so on. > Another common confusion is caused when they pronounce "I" ([ai]) as > [i:]. The problem is that there are /no/ rules of pronunciation in English. Either you know how to pronounce a word, or you don't -- no way to figure it out (like you can in Latin languages; there are clear pronunciation rules for most combinations of letters). And even some native speakers only /think/ they know, and then there's AE and BE and AuE and NZE and IE and ME and ... (in no particular order), and each of them may use a pronunciation of [ai] where another uses an [i:] :) > Which part of the world follow this continental European convention? It's not "a part", it's a number of countries. Just have a look at the link I provided: >> See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_separator To me, it seems that Howard is on to something when he says "I think it's basically UK and former colonies". Most others seem to use the comma. > in Singapore AFAIK, former British colony. > and China, Not quite a British colony, but it's first strong commercial contacts with European culture were with the British -- again AFAIK. My knowledge of Asian history is spotty... > the same in US Former British colony. They still use "imperial" units in domestic trade :) > and Japan. Not sure why there, but possibly that has its roots in the US occupation after WW2? Or was it already like this before WW2? If so, possibly because of the British domination of commerce with Europe in that region. > India is also using ".", Former British colony. > so only the monority in the world is using ",". Correct. It seems that's because only a minority in the world resisted the British domination :) BTW, it seems the British have abandoned their Commonwealth also in this respect -- the new British standard for technical drawings (BS 8888) adopts the decimal comma. I don't know when and why the comma was adopted by ISO. My guess is that this was because the main countries that are using the dot traditionally don't (or didn't) value international standards much. As the "main countries" I see China, India and the USA. Both China and India only recently started to participate in international commerce, see the importance of international standards and gain weight in shaping them, so they may have not had a strong position (or cared much) by the time ISO 31-0 was created. The USA traditionally don't care much for international standards -- neither in creating them nor in following them (which is a precondition for their creation, of course) --, so their participation in creating them often is not strong. Possibly a combination of factors like these left the "dot side" without strong representation in ISO during the creation of this standard. I see one practical and one esthetic reason for the comma. The practical one is that the dot is just too easy to vanish (or appear) in bad faxes and copies; a comma is more substantial in print. The esthetic one is that I like the dot as the end of a sentence, and not in the middle of a sentence, as it appears when using numbers with decimal fractions (like currency values) in sentences. Gerhard -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist