In Australia, trades (like plumbers & carpenters) work in millimetres only. Well, except for a few old codgers (and a few young ones) who refuse to stop using inches. Your 80cm shelf is referred to as eight hundred mm. The old 6-foot is eighteen hundred, not 180cm or 1.8 metres. And yes, if you ask for a 6-foot piece of timber, it will be a bit short! You need to ask for a piece eighteen thirty in length. It also sorts out the amatuers from the pro's, if you ask for a 7.5cm pipe in the plumbing shop, you're not a plumber. Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu]On Behalf > Of Gerhard Fiedler > Sent: Saturday, 8 October 2005 8:46 PM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [EE] Google calculator (includes units) > > > Harold Hallikainen wrote: > > > how much do you use centi, deci, deka, etc. instead of just going with > > milli? In electronics, we don't use centiamps! > > I can't really speak for the rest of the world, but I can speak from some > thirty years experience with everyday life in Germany. The most common > length units in normal life are centimeter, meter and kilometer. > > Millimeter is almost only used in technical contexts; a millimeter is just > too small for everyday life's issues. For small everyday lengths, the > centimeter is the unit of choice; you'd say for example "that shelf is > about two centimeters thick". You probably use centimeter in similar > contexts as you'd use inch in the USA. Above ten centimeters, you use > mostly multiples of ten, like in "that cupboard is eighty centimeters wide" > -- and it's understood that this is not usually 80+-1, it's something > between roughly 70 and 90 or so. The decimeter is known but I've never seen > or heard it being used outside of textbooks. Bigger than that, you use > meters, usually in a form that could be translated as "six meter thirty" > for 6.3 m. For distances of thousand meters or above, it's the kilometer. > Dekameter is probably largely unknown to the general public. The 1/2 is > still common ("three and a half meter") instead of 0.5, but other than > that, it's mostly decimal if you need to go to precisions higher than 1/2. > Rounding happens more in the numbers than in jumping units; you'd say that > your street block is 80 meters wide, or that it's only 300 meters to your > friend's house. > > You are right for technical drawings -- here the normal micro, milli, kilo > are being used almost exclusively. > > I've heard on occasion the argument that in the metric system the numbers > are not round. That's just plain hogwash. Of course, if you want to express > 3 1/2 inches in millimeters and calculate the /exact/ value of 3 1/2 > inches, it's something that has usually one decimal of a millimeter -- not > really a "round" number (88.9 mm). But if you consider that the 3 1/2 > inches are in reality 3 1/2 inches +-1/4 inch, for example, then you surely > can find a centimeter value within that range that is as "round" as "3 1/2" > -- try nine, which is what you probably would come up with if you started > out estimating in centimeters. And there's not much difference whether you > call that log a two by four or a five by ten; it's neither 2 by 4 inches > nor 5 by 10 centimeters anyway :) > > Gerhard > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist