On 9/22/05, Jesse Lackey <jsl-ml@celestialaudio.com> wrote:
> Sorry I should have been clearer... the PIC in the project does
> virtually nothing.  The IP is the switcher design.  The point is to make
> it hard to identify what chip is being used.  I could care less if the
> PIC code is extracted.
>
> Mike, do you have firsthand experience with a product that was de-potted
> and cloned, or are your comments anecdotal?  I personally don't see how
> this design is going to be quickly reverse-engineered without IC
> markings on the key part.
>

http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?KeywordSearch&Keywords=BK570-ND

Regards,
Mark
markrages@gmail

--
You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one.
  - fortune cookie

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist