Chen Xiao Fan wrote :

>From my experience with 12F629/675, erased it first by
> ERASE command and then use the WRITE command does help 
> in the cases. I guess it is really less demanding. 
> Still it needs to read the device ID bits and then
> preserve the bandgap bits (within the configuration
> word) and the OSCCAL value. So I am also not so sure
> why the ERASE command can do the trick in my test
> cases. Without the ERASE command first, test of xwisp2
> using 12F629/675 with INTOSC and internal /MCLR
> will fail.
> 
> Regards,
> Xiaofan

Interesting...

I definitly have to test this "logical dongle" myself.
It seems easier then the "physical dongle"... :-)

Best Regards,
Jan-Erik.



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist