At 11:56 AM 9/13/2005 +0400, you wrote:
> > Ugh, that's a terrible idea. To be fair, it does clearly say "untested".
> >
> > You need only glance at the Vgs(th) min/max/typ figures and typical on-
> > region characteristics to see how bad it really is.
> >
> > http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/2N/2N7000.pdf
>
>BSS138 instead ?

Better, but p-channel would be so much better again. Or NPN emitter follower,
or PNP BJT with base resistors.

Best regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
->> Inexpensive test equipment & parts http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZspeff


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist