Bob Blick wrote:

>> And another thing, didn't you mean to write 12F675, not 16F675?
>  
>
Well . . . both yes and no.  :-)  I meant to write 16F675, and I did 
write 16F675, but I SHOULD have written 12F675.  So the bottom line is 
that you are correct, and I was just plain mistaken about the number of 
the chip.  There is a reason for having made that mistake, but it is not 
a very good one, and so I will not present it here.

John


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist