Bob Axtell wrote :

> > 2. It seems that there is now a requirement to periodically 
> > refresh the EEPROM. Microchip recommends it but the
> > reason was never clear. Their method takes too
> > much code space  to implement.
> 

And PicDude commented :

>  Refreshes would put me over that amount...

Is this some *other* EEPROM-refresh then
the already well-known one ?

And if so, any pointers ?

Regards,
Jan-Erik.



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist