>> I'd suggest trying rate of change of velocity.

> What a great idea!  And here we were all wasting time talking about
> measuring accelleration.

One could reasonably infer, with a prospect of being in error, that he 
meant rate of rate of change, which may well be useful.


        RM 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist