> The key is to have a company that doesn't
> inhibit Open Source development by withholding critical 
> information about a product or process. I have yet to see one
> instance where MChip has done that. Have you?

interfaces!
- MLAB <-> ICD2 interface (RS232/USB)
- MLAB <-> third party programmer software

I am not stating that uChip is doing too little, or doing bad compared
to others. I wouldn't know what to base such a verdict on.

This thread started with a request for suggestions for how uChip could
do better, compared to what they do now. Just that: suggestions. It
is/would be up to uChip to evaluate such suggestions (as undoubtedly
they evaluate their own ideas) on cost/yield, or whatever other criteria
they want to use.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist