Why is a substandard archiver subscribed to the piclist when there are 
other, much better ones (like gmane.org) which do not barf on 
'dangerous' pdf attachments, especially when such barfing makes the 
posting useless. I suppose blogger.com accepts .doc attachments ? >;-)>

Peter

(the article appears with the attachment, alas renamed to .bin, at:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic/66893

(I will email Lars@gmane about the attachment suffix)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: postgateway@blogger.com
Subject: Blogger post failed

Blogger does not accept application/pdf files.

Error code: 7.735246

Original message:
From: plp@actcom.co.il
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:56:53 +0300 (IDT)
Subject: Re: [PIC] Excessive 12F629 current usage
None
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist