On Aug 22, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Paul Hutchinson wrote:

> RedHat is no longer a free software vendor, they changed to an annual
> subscription based service over a year ago.

But they sell (for an annual subscription fee) software that is
"free" by virtue of open source, right?  Or have they managed to
circumvent the copyleft?  You're paying for convenience, bundling,
and support, as per RMS dogma, and Redhat is profitable following
that model, right?

BillW
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist