Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

>> Now I may just rationalize why I don't need what I don't have, but I
>> really think I would seriously try to avoid recursion even if I had it
>> available.
> 
> But it would be better if the compiler forced you to avoid it :)

That's exactly what it is doing :)

> And when doing that, it could caculate your stack usage, and check it
> against the stack/ram limits of the chip (and maybe take evasive action
> on the stack aspect).

Not sure you made a joke here, but if not -- how would the compiler
calculate the stack usage of a recursive algorithm that operates on an ADC
input?

Gerhard
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist