> As I said, it's a compromise. You have to decide the risks of 
> failure and costs of recovery versus code usage.

I seriously think in most cases a switch to a larger PIC would be a
better choice than risking a field problem.

> but this can be controlled by
> careful testing and administration.  

Hmmmm. Murphy will be smiling.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist